Which would be worse for you?
To eat something unhealthy for lunch, or to not eat at all?
Answers:
To not eat at all. If you eat something unhealthy you can balance it out with something healthy the next day or by exercising it off. Not eating is way worse.
NOT EAT AT ALl is WAY more unhealthy!
Eat somthing unhealthy!
To eat something healthy.
eat the unhealthy just not alot of it.
not eat at all
depends on what ur eating
If I'm hungry, no contest! :-)
the worse would to be to not eat at all because even if its fattening food it is food
it all depends, I would say you need to eat so I guess a little unhealthy would not be bad..
If you do it on a regular basis?
Neither one is good for you, but not eating at all is putting yourself on the fast track to some serious health problems.
to eat something not healthy
I would rather not eat anything at all.
eat something.so your metabolism will kick in
not eating at all. eating something unhealthy is bad but eating nothing is worse.
If u just mean lunch I say not eat it, we're not talking nothing all day long. If you are that concerned, and if you are talking about school or something bring ur own lunch. if this is just a scenario, I have a third answer: eat something healthy. Hope I helped!
~curlytop904~
Eat something unhealthy. I can not eat a meal or fast for a day, no problem. But eating something yukky and maybe getting sick is not my idea of a good time.
The page content post from users, we do not guarantee its accuracy. If you belong to the copyright which contains information, please contact us to remove it.
More Questions...