18-25 yaer old men only please?
what is circumcision?
Answers:
It is an unnecessary mutilation of the penis commonly performed on infant boys. It originated as a tribal custom and turned into a money maker for the medical community that now perpetuates it.
And it is just as painful for an infant or child as it is for an adult, its just that an adult won't put up with it.
I was a victim of childhood circumcision 50 years ago at the age of 6. Whoops, I guess that means I don't qualify for your age group.
Oh well too bad.
No circumcision before age 18.
His body. His choice.
cutting of foreskin
It is the removal of the foreskin at the tip of the penis
dude chill man and shut up
I am a guy, 51, am circumcised. Why can't I answer?
THE DR. PULLS THE EXTRA SKIN FROM THE PENIS AND TRIMS IT OFF. NOT HARD FOR BABIES. NOT TO GOOD FOR OLDER GUYS.
yea foreskin its a hygene thing and dont forget to groom down there
LOL WHY would you only refer this question to guys 18-25? even a 12 year old can answer this for you. Circumcision is when your a baby they cut off the extra skin off your penis, most religions do this, islam, christianity, catholics etc. its a good thing too the extra skin on your penis just make its dirty even more then it already is
it is the removal of the loose skin covering the penis. Usually routinally done at birth. in my case i was not circumcised until i was 5 years old when the skin became too tight and surgery was necessary. today i am glad i got it done.
i,m not in the medical field, and slight older than your requested "bracket" but it is surgicly removing a boy baby,,s foreskin from the penis. it has ben debated as to whether it is a nessicity or a throw back to more primitave times and practices. some religons however practice and require it . australian aboriganies,primitave people in new guiena and in some parts of africa female "circumcison" is practiced as well as male,i,m pretty sure moslems practice it., it,s also a jewish law.i have never heard a uroligist say for sure that he/she thought it is a medical nessicaty . they just will not take a stand on that issue. i am unable to give you this info on any authority.. it only comes from what i,ve read . i,ve often wondered about this practice myself
ummm-wait only 18-25 year old men.ill leave..but 1st..2 points
wow ur kinda dumb.im a girl and even i know. ive known since i was like 11 years old
google search
It started in the US to avoid boys from masturbate. Now it is only for Doctors to make money. US and Israel are the only countries in the World that do it.
RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/
HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water! Women produce much more “smegma” because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.
MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if phimosis occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
And now they invented a new reason to make money, the risk of STD in uncircumcised men. Well actually uncircumcised men have more protection, but in practical terms that protection means nothing, because circumcised or not, if you have sex without protection and your partner have an STD you will be infected FOR SURE! That means, it is just one more stupid and desperate reason in order to make money with circumcisions.
SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circunsized men will have to deal with disconfot and dry glans.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!
If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a big uproar about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parents decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him?.
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!
Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.noharmm.org/
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html
The page content post from users, we do not guarantee its accuracy. If you belong to the copyright which contains information, please contact us to remove it.
More Questions...